Since the eighteenth century, the meaning of the concept " literature" has become a challenging and a controversial concern among different literary universities. What is materials? What are the qualities that distinguish a literary text from a non-literary one? Does books have any kind of particular function in society? These are a lot of crucial questions whose answers were likely to limit and define the scope of " literature". However , numerous literary and critical colleges have advanced different and contradictory reactions to these same questions, which have consequently led to a failure in producing a great authoritatively proven definition of " literature". This failure can be ascribed to numerous reasons, yet because the length of the paper will not allow to tackle all of them, the future paragraphs will be devoted to talk about only two main reasons. The first explanation is the difficulty to distinguish among " fact" and " fiction" in certain works which in turn, as it will probably be clarified in the few arriving paragraphs, were anthropological and documentary and were later on seen as imaginary, or vice versa. The second reason lives in the distinct perspectives where different fictional theories have got based their views regarding literature. This paper is, therefore , an attempt to highlight the indeterminacy of the concept " literature" by outlining and extending on these two major causes. To begin with, the idea of " literature", originated from the Latin expression " littera", was released into British in the fourteenth century. In the beginning, it absolutely was not vague or indeterminate as in their modern employ. It was applied then to relate to " a condition of reading: penalized able to browse and of having read" (Williams, Marxism and Literature, 46). Hence, it had been used to have a meaning comparable to that of " literacy", that was coined and introduced into English at the begining of nineteenth century when the idea " literature" was developed and also a different impression. This new feeling, which was attributed to the development of printing, was " a specialization В… to the published word and especially the branded books with certain quality [imaginative works]" (Williams, 46). To elaborate about this explanation, R. Wellek and A. Warren have stated that " in all of the of them [the printed books with certain quality], the research is to the world of fiction, of imagination" (Wellek and Warren, Theory of Literature, 25). However , a simple review of a history of prose narrative varieties would present that this definition of literature as being a category of imaginary and imaginative writings can be irrelevant. Various writings that were written because anthropological documentaries were making use of fiction, although other imaginary works received the position of documented and truthful writings. Most travelogue writings and western historiography between middle ages plus the twentieth century are good cases to illustrate this point. Works like Big t. E. Lawrence's Seven Pillars of Wisdom, W. Meters. Thackeray's Coming from Cornhill to Cairo, Kingslake's Eothen, and Sir Jones More's Utopia made use of both fact and fiction. Additionally, at the time of their appearance, most of these functions were conceptualized of by western audience as informative and documentary writings. Down the road, due to some historical and political modifications in our world, these kinds of writings started to be conceived of as imaginary and fictional works. As a result, defining materials on the grounds of truth versus fictional is questionable and invalid. With the advancement criticism on the western part of the country in the nineteenth century, several attempts, depending on new concepts other than the distinction among fact and fiction, have been completely advanced simply by different strategies in order to develop " accurate" definitions to " literature". However , the contradictory points of views, upon which these attempts have been based, have made the project of determining " literature" more complicated; they may have constituted a hindrance for the production of your authoritatively founded definition of " literature". Actually despite every...
Cited: Adim, Firdaous. The Colonial Rise of the Book. London: Routledge, 1993.
Boehmer, Elleke. Colonial and Postcolonial Books. London: Oxford
School Press, 95.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Posting, 1983.
Wellek, Ur. and Warren, A. Theory of Literary works. Harmondsworth:
Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Books. London: Oxford University